Skip to main content
Billing Infrastructure for Agents

StringCost:
Credit-based Billing for AI Companies.

StringCost automatically creates and prices credits from your underlying token, reasoning, and MCP costs. Then calculates consumption, margin, handles billing overages and invoicing with complex Cost-Plus calculations.

Implement the credit-based billing model used by Lovable without building the backend yourself. Without integrating any complex code or SDKs.

Protect MarginsPrevent Bill ShockShip Faster

A production-grade credit system needs to handle complex logic that billing providers like Stripe don't support.

“You must use Credit-based billing for your AI agent startup, or you are NGMI.”

Founder
YC AI StartupYC

“Everyone burns 3/4 of their funding and then realizes you should have been on Credit-based billing instead of usage-based billing.”

CEO
a16z Voice Agent Startupa16z

“It is so much easier selling Credit based billing & pricing to enterprises than convince their CFO to sign off on unpredictable usage costs.”

Senior FDEBanking & Financial Services

Why AI Companies Must Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Credits

Lovable

Real-World Example: AI Builder “Lovable”

Lovable transitioned to a credit-based billing system with its Agent Mode launch on July 23, 2025, making complex AI tasks cost variable credits. On the surface, it's a great example of outcome-based billing. But the implementation revealed critical lessons:

Rapid, Opaque Burn

Users saw credits vanish without explanation. One user spent $225 in a month with zero transparency on why. StringCost solves this with audit logs for every deduction.

Failures Cost Money

If the AI errored 3x, Lovable still charged. Users felt punished for the tool's mistakes. StringCost lets you programmatically refund failed tool calls.

Unpredictable Costs

A feature that cost 5 credits one day might cost 8 the next. StringCost provides strict rate-limiting and cost-capping per user.

Strategic Friction

Positive friction: Users admitted the credit cost forced them to “think strategically” and reduce waste. Used correctly, credits align incentives.

The takeaway: Credits are the right model, but a poor implementation alienates users. StringCost gives you the Lovable model—without the user backlash.

a16z

Andreessen Horowitz just declared:

“AI is driving a shift towards outcome-based pricing. Software is becoming labor.”

In practice, “Outcome-based Billing” means Credits.

Look at the industry leaders: Lovable, Gamma, and Miro have all shifted to credit-based models to solve usage volatility.

Why the Math Doesn't Work for Subscription & Usage Billing

You are building an agent. You have two traditional choices for billing, and both of them fail. The third choice is the only one that scales.

Old Way

Subscription

The "Unlimited" Trap

$20/mo

Flat fee for access.

Scenario

Power User Loop

A user runs a complex agent loop (GPT-4o, 30 iterations) to fix a bug. They do this 5 times a week.

Infra Cost:$25.00/mo
Revenue:$20.00/mo
Net Loss:-$5.00
×Margin Collapse: Your best users are your biggest expense. 4 heavy users wipe out profit from 100 light ones.
×Static: You can't ship new, expensive models because you can't charge more for them.
Old Way

Usage Billing

The "Taxi Meter"

$0.03/run

Pay-as-you-go metering.

Scenario

The Cost Anxiety

You show a live cost meter. User stares at the "Run Agent" button and hesitates.

“Will this run cost $0.10 or loop 50 times and cost $10.00? I better not click it.”

×Adoption Freeze: Users are afraid to explore your product because costs are uncapped.
×Cognitive Load: Users don't know what a "token" is. You are forcing them to do math.
The Fix

Credits Billing

Value-Based Pricing

Prepaid & Postpaid

Users buy packs (e.g. 500 credits for $20).

Scenario

Outcome Alignment

User spends credits on results (e.g. "Fix Bug"). They already paid, so they feel safe.

Guaranteed MarginPrice "Research Task" at 50 credits. If cost is $0.50, you lock in 50% margin.
Predictability CapPrepayment acts as a spending cap. Zero surprise bills = Zero anxiety.
Flexible PricingChange "Fast Mode" cost to 2x credits on the fly without changing plans.

Result: Aligns Price, Cost & Value.

The Hidden Complexity of Credit-based Billing for AI Startups

“We'll just add a column to the users table.”

1Non-Linear Burn Rates

Not all agents are equal. You need to charge different rates for "Fast Mode" (GPT-4) vs "Standard Mode" (GPT-3.5) dynamically based on the model selected at runtime.

2Real-Time Blocking

If a user runs out of credits during a stream, you must cut the connection instantly. Polling every minute isn't enough; you need millisecond-level gatekeeping.

3Rollover Logic

Enterprise contracts are messy. "Monthly credits expire, but Top-Up credits roll over." Your ledger must distinguish between different types of credits in the same wallet.

4Concurrency & Locking

When a user fires 5 parallel agent requests, you can't just read/write the balance. You need atomic locking to prevent double-spending and race conditions.

5Input-Cost Awareness

To guarantee margin, the burn rate must be tied to live input costs (tokens). A static "1 credit per run" kills your margin if the run loops 50 times.

6Refills & Top-Ups

When a user hits 0, you need an auto-recharge trigger that pings Stripe. Building this orchestration securely is a full product in itself.

Credits Require a New Kind of Infrastructure

Only a proxy can see the full economic picture — and turn usage chaos into clean, trustable credits.

The AI economy needed a new billing unit — the credit. But to make credits programmable, cost-aware, and fair, we had to observe everything. That's why we built StringCost as a proxy.

StringCost Financial Architecture

Total Observability

Every token, tool call, reasoning loop — captured at the edge.

Real-Time Costs

Live cost visibility across 250+ LLMs and APIs instantly.

Dynamic Burn

Adjust credit burn per call, per agent, per product line.

Policy Engine

Built-in pricing logic, expiry, and economic policy enforcement.

Flexible Consumption Mapping

The hardest part of the complexity is simply deciding how many credits each action “costs”. StringCost supports flexible mapping strategies:

1

Dynamic Proportional

Tie credits to measurable units like 1 credit per 1,000 tokens. Abstraction keeps it simple for users, while protecting your margin.

2

Tiered & Fast-Lane

Charge non-linearly. A “Fast Agent” using a premier model consumes credits faster than a standard agent. You define the rate.

3

Outcome-Based Bundles

Price per coarse outcome (e.g., “Video Gen = 20 credits”). Crucially, our proxy ensures the burn is proportional to actual backend costs.

How It Works

Drop-in Billing Infrastructure

You don't need to build a ledger, write a proxy, or handle race conditions in Postgres. StringCost handles the plumbing.

1. The Proxy

Route your LLM calls through `api.stringcost.com`. We act as a gateway between your app and OpenAI/Anthropic.

2. The Ledger

We meter tokens in real-time. We calculate the cost, check the user's wallet balance, and deduct credits instantly.

3. The Gatekeeper

Zero balance? Request blocked. You never pay for an API call that you haven't already been paid for.

Stripe handles the Charge.

We handle the Credits Modelling, Consumption & Billing.

Building a credit system is hard. You need to handle top-ups, expirations, decimals, and concurrency. StringCost gives you a robust Credits Proxy Gateway so you can focus on building your agent, not your billing engine.