Skip to main content
AI Spend Is Out of Control

One Runaway Agent.
One Weekend.
$1,500.

AI coding assistants execute autonomous agentic loops — reading files, running tests, iterating on errors — burning metered LLM tokens with no human in the loop. You don't find out until the invoice arrives.

Avg daily cost

$6

Power user peak

$1,500/day

StringCost closes the gap.

Real-time anomaly detection fires in 15 minutes. User-level and project-level spend tracking — before the invoice arrives.

Trusted by YC and a16z-backed teams

The Pricing Model That
Broke Your Budget

AI tools didn't just change how developers write code — they changed how vendors charge for it.

OLD

Traditional SaaS

Predictable Per-Seat Cost

$20/seat/month, same every month. Budget once, forget about it.

Static Utilization

Every seat costs the same regardless of usage.

VS
NEW

AI Coding Assistants

Volatile Per-Token Cost

A single agent loop can 10x your bill overnight.

Dynamic Consumption

Power users cost 50x more than light users.

78% of IT leaders report unexpected charges from AI consumption tiers. The flat-rate SaaS budget is a myth in the age of LLM inference.

Shadow AI Is Already
in Your Organization

When procurement moves slower than productivity, developers take matters into their own hands.

Fragmented Purchasing

Engineering teams expense Cursor, Copilot, and direct API subscriptions on separate corporate cards — zero central IT oversight.

Security Circumvention

When corporate VPNs block AI tools, developers photograph code on personal phones and use consumer-grade AI via mobile networks.

Budget Leakage

20 developers independently expensing a $20/mo AI tool costs $4,800/year in unmanaged spend — plus IP exposure to unvetted LLMs.

Track Every Dollar to the
Developer and the Project

Monolithic AI invoices are a relic. Modern FinOps requires attribution down to the user, the repo, and the cost center.

User-Level Tracking

License Harvesting & ROI

  • Identify inactive seats — 20 unused Copilot licenses = $5,000+/year wasted
  • Distinguish “active” vs “engaged” users with deep engagement telemetry
  • Correlate token spend with pull request volume, cycle time, and bug rates
+

Project-Level Tracking

Chargebacks & Capitalization

  • Tag AI costs to specific repos, teams, or clients for accurate chargebacks
  • Separate CapEx (new R&D) from OpEx (maintenance) for ASC 350-40 compliance
  • Consulting firms: pass exact AI inference costs through to client invoices

Native Vendor Tracking
Isn't Enough

Each AI tool provides different levels of governance. StringCost fills the gaps across all of them.

Dimension
GitHub Copilot
Cursor
Claude Code
User-Level Tracking
Native (Usage Metrics API)
Native (Analytics API)
Native (Analytics API)
Project/Repo Tracking
Native (Cost Centers)
Limited (custom polling)
Proxy headers required
Departmental Chargeback
Automated (Azure Subs)
Highly manual
Infrastructure dependent
Anomaly Alerts
Soft budgets
External tooling needed
Cloud gateway required
Pricing Predictability
Seat + premium requests
Pooled credits + overages
Pure token consumption

StringCost unifies all three into a single pane of glass with real-time attribution, anomaly detection, and automated chargebacks.

The Financial Case for a
500-Employee Enterprise

A typical mid-market company with 150 technical staff faces $120K–$180K/year in baseline AI tool costs — before overages.

Risk
Unmanaged
With StringCost
Shadow AI
Dispersed spend, IP violations
Centralized dashboard, SSO
Inactive Licenses
Paying for non-contributing users
User-level telemetry, auto-harvesting
Runaway Token Burn
$1,000+ daily spikes
Real-time alerts, hard limits
Untracked Project Costs
Margin erosion, flawed CapEx
Repo-level attribution, cost centers

Stop budgeting AI like it's SaaS.
Start managing it like infrastructure.

User-level tracking. Project-level attribution. Real-time anomaly detection. One platform.

No integration required
Works with any provider
Enterprise ready